Andre Stitt – Situation Seminar

 

Image result for victor pasmore apollo pavilion
Victor Pasmore, Apollo Pavilion, 1969

 

Related image

The Apollo Pavilion is an example of a piece of public art that was met with a negative reaction from the people it was made for. Victor Pasmore was appointed Consulting Director of Architectural Design and helped to design the surrounding estate in Peterlee as well as the Pavilion, which was intended as a pedestrian bridge and never as a stand alone art work. The design of the housing estate mirrors that of the bridge, which in turn is an extension of Pasmore’s relief paintings.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

However the Pavilion fell into disrepair and was subject to vandalism, leading to complaints from residents. In 2008 the Apollo Pavilion was repaired and road signs erected in an effort to increase footfall.

The art work raises the question of the importance of the residents opinion when designing public art and also the social consequences of making art in this way. The idea of Art and life becoming connected is something that appears logical in theory but in reality has negative effects because it can be detrimental to the quality of life for residents. (e.g Park Hill Sheffield  Other installations which have been met with similar controversy are Rachel Whiteread’s House and Anthony Gormley’s  Sculpture for Derry walls.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Advertisements

1 thought on “Andre Stitt – Situation Seminar”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s